Boom Gate Removal Order in Kelana Jaya: What Residents Need to Know
Residents of SS4C and SS4D in Kelana Jaya face potential removal of boom gates. Learn about the history, the debate, and the potential impact on the community.
Residents of SS4C and SS4D in Kelana Jaya face potential removal of boom gates. Learn about the history, the debate, and the potential impact on the community.
A potential issue is brewing in the Kelana Jaya area of Petaling Jaya concerning the presence of boom gates in residential sections. Residents of Sections SS4C and SS4D are facing a situation where the local authorities might order the removal of these gates.
Sections SS4C and SS4D have been established for a long time. These residential areas were developed between the late 1970s and the early 1980s, decades ago. This historical context is important because the concept of gated and guarded communities was not common, or even considered, during the original planning phase of these neighborhoods.
Essentially, the idea of having controlled access points, like boom gates and security guards, was not part of the initial blueprint for SS4C and SS4D. This means that the current gated-and-guarded setup is something that was implemented by residents at a later stage, after the neighborhoods were already established.
The potential removal of the boom gates raises several concerns for the residents. Boom gates often restrict entry only to residents and authorized visitors, and provides a sense of security. However, they can also impede free movement of people and traffic, possibly disrupting service providers and visitors.
The core of the issue revolves around the legitimacy of these boom gates considering the original development plans. Since the gated-and-guarded concept wasn’t part of the initial planning, the local authorities are reviewing whether these structures are permitted or if they need to be taken down. The outcome of this review will significantly impact the day-to-day lives of residents in SS4C and SS4D, and also create a potentially precedent setting example.
This situation highlights a larger debate about the increase in gated communities. Concerns regarding security have led many neighborhoods to implement these types of systems. But, some local authorities worry about the legality and fairness of privatizing public roads.
For residents, the removal of boom gates could change the environment of the neighborhood. Some residents could find the free flow of traffic preferable, while others may lose their sense of comfort and security that the boom gates previously provided. Understanding the historical context and potential impacts is crucial for everyone involved as the situation develops.
© Copyright 2020, All Rights Reserved